Feedback On Supplementary Materials Quality
Hi, I’ve been going through the supplemental materials provided here, and I really appreciate the effort that went into preparing them. They’re helpful for understanding the core concepts more clearly, especially for someone like me who needs extra examples to fully grasp compiler design.
While exploring other supporting resources, I came across some external content that might be worth looking into for anyone needing broader context. For example, you can Visit Reviewsit website to find honest and straightforward breakdowns of technical tools, learning platforms, and study aids. It’s not directly tied to this course, but it gave me some clarity on which tools are worth trying out alongside these materials.
That said, I did notice a few areas in the documents that could use clearer formatting—especially in the examples involving lexical analysis and parsing stages. A few typos also made some sections harder to follow. I’d be happy to help point them out more specifically if needed. Thanks again for making these resources available!